Do Woman Make Better Leaders Essay

However, when wo men leaders atomic number 18 putt glorious greatly, they need to sacrifice their parts of life to earn such a success. Mostly, they need to work overnight and hard like their anthropoid fellows, they be single or divorced, and they whitethorn need to condition wield of both of their c argoner and children. Actually, womanish leaders atomic number 18 facing many practical problems in their emotion, c argonr and family. Many pistillates are suffering in balancing these movers. Do women give birth break leader than men? Or specifically, are women blowouting a better role in managers? What are issues women leaders facing?In order to solve these problems and leave no doubt, I write this essay to analyze this topic. 2. 1 Leadership consort to the professional definition, leading is the process of influencing an organized group toward accomplishing its goals. (Roach & Behling, 1984) There are certain basic qualities or characteristics that most muckle ass ociate with leadership, such as self-confidence, persistent, integrity, ambitious and determination. People would agree that who own these qualities arsehole be labeled as leaders. However, it is usually hard to recognize a proper leader with a standard measurement.Human traits are judge immeasurable. In daily whole works, a proper leader is normally judged by raft he or she leads. Unfortunately, these opinions are always subjective and biased. counterfeit performances may consider being comparable to(predicate). However, in reality, only similar works stack provide comparable performance results which limit the number of comparable cases. Insufficient parameters cannot provide a reliable analysis. Due to these difficulties, this essay provide compare female and male leaders in early(a) factors which are not specialized and quantized for leaders but overly providing references for good leaders.These factors include authorisation, light and posture which compare leade rs in the aspects of performances psychical and psychological measures and reliability, respectively. Before comparison and analyzing, it is more reasonable to piddle the current situation rough sex and leadership which will also give readers a general idea. 2. 2 Men are save the major force in leaders Actually, majority of world tacit consider that domination of power is in mans hand, though women leaders are increasing rapidly recent years.As statistics taper, charrhood card for 51 percent of population and 46. 5 percent of dig up force small-arm their numbers in manage level are negligible. In fact, in more powerful positions, women only account for 7. 3 percent of Fortune 500 corporate line officers only 4. 1 percent of top earners are women. (Catalyst, 2001) The true situation is like what Oakley ,J. G. said, The boilersuit percentage of women on corporate boards surpassed the 10% milestone for the first cartridge holder in 1996, however, 105 out of the 500 compani es surveyed still had no women on their boards. (Oakley, 2000 Dobrsynski, 1996)In making such a males world, hearty and environment factors roleplay critical roles. Traditionally, women are told to be less competitive and ambitious when they are still girls, when they contract their careers, mostly, environment and themselves keep suggesting them to be more unleader-like and docile. This attitude is formed in a ample period and by touch environment, and it actually becomes part of females character. place toward leadership is stronger prognosticator of leader emergence than masculinity. (Kolb, 1999) This possibility is even more reasonable when biological science theory is abandoned.Generally, majority of leaders is still male , the roles that women are told to play and attitudes they are suggested to own is signaling to be second class. 2. 3 Woman leaders show great potential It is undoubtedly men are traditionally leaders in the society nevertheless, women are undercover work up in an amazing speed. Especially in recent years, woman leaders are showing their great power. In a long period before, people believe that women lack of managerial skills and they define it as female deficiencies as a reason why a few(prenominal) women feed made it to the top. Steven, Lynda and Joanne, 2003) However, many professors switch proved the irrationality of this stereotypical concept, Davidson and slay (Davidson&Burke,1994) attain contended that almost all the evidence shows little or few difference in the traits and abilities of managerial skills among women and men. Furthermore, Ferrario(Ferrario,1994), Carless(Carless,1998) and Komives (Komives,1991) give up studied and proved that gender does not determine who should get the leadership.According to above statements, it is easy to draw in that gender is not physical or psychical obstacle for female leaders. Moreover, Kent and Moss suggested the possession of feminine characteristics does not decrease an mortals chances of appear as a leader as long as the individual also possesses masculine characteristics. If women are more likely to be androgynous, they may have better chance of rising to leadership status. (Kent and Moss, 1994) Kent and Moss words can be explained related to womens own characteristic.Normally, women are more comprehendible and modest. The advantage is obvious above male leaders cannot combine females good personalities which will be considered to be sissy while females will treat androgynous as a merit which show their potential. So, in just about kinds of careers which require managers to be more mild and communicative, such as teachers and nurses, woman leaders are more preferred. To affection up, womens characteristic advantage is seen as particularly important in well-situated of the trends toward flatter organizations, team-based management and increased globalization. Oakley,2000 Adler,1993Rosener,1995) Undoubtedly, woman leaders have predominance in slightly specific works than man leaders 2. 4 Gender and the leadership 2. 4. 1 Intelligence comparison Intelligence is defined by Cronbach as a persons all-around soundness in activities directed by sentiment. (Cronbach, 1984) Intelligence can divide in twain parts, schoolman parole and emotional intelligence. In the aspect of academic intelligence, it is well accepted that in that location is no difference in academic intelligence between men and women. Furthermore, people with high academic intelligence dont repute they are good leaders.Obviously, traditional look at about intelligence is quite narrow. Current research has denied the theory of IQ as the only measure of intelligence. In 1920 Thorndike hypothesized that true intelligence was be of not only an academic component, but also emotional and social components. (Barbara& Shilpa, 2003) Bar-on argued that emotional and social intelligences were better predictors of success in life. (Bar-on, 1997) According to Barb ara& Shilpas statistic analysis, the mean transformational leadership score of females and males are roughly the same (65. 21 and 63. 31 respectively).The mean emotional intelligence score for females was higher than the mean emotional intelligence score for females (109. 58 and 98. 31 respectively). (Barbara& Shilpa, 2003) Although the results of the current ingest suggest that females have scored higher than males in emotional intelligence, it is possible that women as compared to men scored higher on empathy or social skills and low on motivation or self-regulation. However , male and females leadership score is very coating which can prove that unalike genders have differences in EQ, but no capability difference in leadership.To sum up, there is no specific gender difference in academic intelligence. Females have a higher score in emotional intelligence and males have an equally emotional leadership score with females. 2. 4. 2 Attitude comparison Attitude means a general and enduring plus or negative feeling about close to person, object or issue. (Kalliath, 2010) Normally, we divide attitude in dickens parts, one is the affective component, and the other one is the behavioral component. Actually, leadership is affected by attitudes in the sniff out that a leaders attitude about their subordinates is dictated by theories X and Y.Theory X in the simplicity means leaders view their subordinates as pessimistic. They believe that the best way to treat subordinates is by manipulating for they think subordinates are lazy and unmotivated. Theory Y thinks oppositely, leaders of theory Y feel that most people are motivated and panic-struck of punishment. (Kalliath, 2010) Normally, leaders with a positive self-concept and a Theory X school of thought tend to be bossy, pushy and impatient they also generally take on a dictatorial leadership. Leaders with a negative self-concept and a Theory Y philosophy may seem afraid to make decisions and self-blaming. Hug hes, Ginnett& Curphy, 1993) Related to above apart, womens attitude is an obstacle for their leadership. This disadvantage is caused by environmental and cultural factors. All stereotyping views towards woman will affect them when they are becoming leaders. However, according to theory X and Y, they generally talk about two types of leaders. It can be seen that gender is not the major factor in attitude. To sum up, woman leaders are normally have more problems in their attitude and valuation than their man opponents. 2. 4. 4 enduringness comparison Effectiveness is understood in terms of leaders facilitation of a group or rganizations ability to meet its goals. (Hunt, 1991 Mumford, 1986) It is stated that there is no difference in effectiveness, although some situations favor women and others favor men. (Powell, 1993)However, some people point out that female leaders may be less effective when they are doing stereotypically masculine jobs. It is easy to understand that women may vi olate conventions concerning appropriate female behavior. Female leaders will be subjected prejudiced reactions, which included biased performance evaluations and negative preconceptions about rising performance.Consistent with research on self-fulfilling prophecies (Geis, 1993), negative opinion towards womens leadership can diminish their performance. Even though, some professors argue that role participation for female leaders might also be minimized by adopting a relatively feminine leadership style that would meet peoples traditional expectations about female behavior. (Eaglly, Makhijiani, Klonsky, 1992) They assert that it is unfair to value the effectiveness in leadership roles that are rarely occupied by women and in which most of their evaluators are male. (Eaglly, Makhijiani, Klonsky, 1995)In order to analyze this issue, two perspectives are introduced alternative perspective and contingency theory based perspective. As a matter of fact, alternative perspective also have two parts, the first one is a structure view suggests that men and women are equally effective in leadership. (House, 1991&Hunt, 1991) Another alternative view takes into account the different selection of men and woman for leadership. Besides gender equation opinion, it also points out that women may be superior performers, especially in the longer run as they may erode negative thinking about their work. Craig &Jacobs, 1985) The second perspective is of contingency theories of leadership, suggests that leaders effectiveness depends on their style of leading. (Bass, 1990) It focuses more in the aspect of leadership style. It insists that effectiveness of different gender is related to corresponding factors in leadership methods, not gender. In a word, although male leaders are considered more effective in traditional masculine jobs, female leaders are more effective than males in less masculine terms. Effectiveness is a reliable confirmation of the woman leadership is not worse t han man leadership.Although some people still believe woman leaders are using some inefficient management methods when they are most in masculine works. It can be expected that females will fare at least as well as men in an increasing range of leadership and managerial roles. 3. Conclusion From the days of old to the modern world, people who have the opinion that men are born to lead and women should serve as followers are out of date. No one can discard the gender equality in the current society. Leaders are no longer the exclusive privilege for men, but also for excellent females.We start to realize the importance of analyzing this topic and have taken a close look at some of the most basic qualities needed in a successful leader, such as attitude, intelligence and effectiveness. While some qualities seem to be more present in males than females, such as attitude, there are still many females owning the necessary characteristics to be better leaders, such as effectiveness in fem inization jobs. This essay collects studies that analyze leadership under rigorous researches and we have also taken a close look at some of the more recent studies on this topic.