An Element of Art and Science Essay

star divination provides a very debatable form of noesis that is generally assessed by the intelligent as a useless strain of intimacy, which only makes sense for the ignorant. At the same time star divination is usually associated with gypsies and hucksters, who are known for their deceptive and fake experience, as they try to cuckold stack for their own financial interest. On the different hand, we find tidy sum with postgraduate education attempting to study astrology and very such(prenominal) respect the kind of knowledge it offers them.Whether such knowledge offered through teaching astrology in universities is worth doing or to be considered an inapplicable knowledge for high education is a critical decision to make, which requires obtaining a great cleverness about astrology it self as an academic range in order to be able to make a correct assessment. astrology is actually a integrated form of knowledge that both combine both the segment of art and of scienc e in its essence.It contains the mathematical element as well as the artistic element o symbol (Astrology? 891). Scientists usually disregard the art side of astrology and cogitate on the basic mathematical authority of it, as they judge it as useless and in important. This actually destroys the aloneness and balance deep down the realm itself. This whitethorn be considered a reason for misunderstanding the real value of knowledge in astrology.It is also a event that every field is defenseless to be used by ignorant people who devoid it exclusively of its meaning and value, in order to sell it as cheap as possible in a market of ignorance that unfortunately have m both an(prenominal) customers who are wiling to buy, over again this helps in misunderstanding Astrology (Astrology? 891) and as there is the presence of the competent and the incompetent in every field, and people usually search for the best in every profession, so wherefore exclude Astrology (Astrology? 896) .Astrology requires a sophisticated kind of mentation as it combines artistic and scientific knowledge, it evoke therefore never be considered as insignificant knowledge. It may non be appreciated by scientists due to the artistic element provided within it, and their total dependency on reason for discovering reality since the onset of the renaissance thus reviving such forms of knowledge actually, shows the evolution of knowledge and thinking that reflects the significance of original forms of knowledge besides the pure rational unmatchables.The astrological systemal knowledge in itself consists of a natural balance between original and rational knowledge, and lamentable this balance will only lead to the production of inconsistent forms of knowledge that seem to appear on the surface to help in the coevals of misunderstandings regarding astrology. The argument of scientists against Astrology reflects the on going disagreement between scientific knowledge and intuitive f orms of knowledge. Scientists never admit the the true in any intuitive understanding, and they usually regarded as invalid.They never accept the fact the riddle is part of reality and that the rational mind can never be able to reach full understanding of the universe. Astrology is a equilibrize kind of knowledge as it respects both forms of thinking, which in fact a respect for character and for the human being as part of that personality. I feel that the purpose of a reading is to understand ones behavior challenges And potential, to provide an opportunity for self reflection and smell Evaluation, as well as to confirm ones intuitive sense of what ones Life is about (Astrology? 895). world beings as well as nature are made of thing and soul that can never be detached from each other as long as life is there. How can scientists reach the truth if they are actually altering the natural balance in life by looking for material proof and ignoring the intuitive reality of natur e? The soul remains a mystery that can never be explained by scientific truth, and science can not resolve the interrogatory of life and death. There fore, accepting astrology as a significant form of knowledge by a scientist is truly a gesture of him admitting intuition as a part of reality.From another(prenominal) side, if the issue had not been on intuition, regarding astrology, it is still a form of knowledge that surely provides the exclusive with some taste about life and introduces him to different kinds of thinking it should be even credited for this reason alone, my studies in Astrology, as well as in other fields, are attempts to understand the grand design of the entire (Astrology? 894). Scientists also accuse Astrological interpretive knowledge of not being exact stars incline but do not oblige (A critical? 882), and this fact works against scientific logic which is crisp and determinant. But actually, life in it self is never exact or straight forward and clear a s mathematical knowledge entails for instance. Astrology may actually provide the best for of understanding of life and nature it allows people to understand reality the way it is without trying to alter its nature. The whole issue of prediction and future related knowledge can never be definite or fully explainable, to discuss future probabilities is much like giving a weather report (Astrology? 896).On the other hand, it should be admitted that Astrological knowledge may help in creating dependent and weak individuals, if they used it wrongly. It might lead them to spin in a cycle, which they might not be able to break. People can stress too much on the intuitive knowledge in Astrology and thus once again altering its balance of logic and intuition and thus getting again a wrong insight about life and nature, with an accompanied change in personality and berth to life Astrology, when practiced as completely as possible, takes away from ach of us our right and duty to make our ow n personal decisions (A Critical? 882). In the case of a scientist who puts great emphasis on logic and excludes intuition, makes him a rough and rigid person who stands weak in front of the scientifically unexplained mysteries of the world while in the case of the ignorant who does the polar to give too much significance to intuition and disregards reason suffers another kind of weakness that creates a dependent and shattered personality.But again we must also admit that this would be the case with any field if wrongly interpreted. All in all, I believe that Astrology is a sophisticated form of knowledge that should be respected for the special thinking abilities it provides an individual who studies it. It also reflects on the importance of providing a balance between Art and Science, and thus between logic and intuition, which is found deep within the nature of man and the universe he lives in.I would very powerfully recommend all institutions of high education to teach Astrolog y in order to correct the misunderstanding entitled to it, and thus expose the bass and deep knowledge it provides. Works Cited Bok, Bart J. A Critical nerve at Astrology. The Humanist Costello, Priscilla. Astrology, Science or Abracadabra? Wellesley College.