The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq Personal Statement

The invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq - Personal offerment ExampleEach of the wars had a level of analysis. These levels were unmarried state, and system. The levels of war analysis form a hierarchy. The responsibilities of the hierarchy rely on the scale and nature of the operation.The person level of analysis in war takes a basic idea of how human traits cause more of the social outcomes in historical instances, including war and peace. There be variations of this idea as listed in a paper written by Wade L. Huntley, Ph.D. titled Causes of War and Paths to Peace written in may of 2004. Those variations include basic human nature, varying features of human nature and both perception and misperception. His considerations behind this would include that in factoring basic human nature, people are basically aggressive, loving, greedy and fearful and so forth. People would be of all sorts of types, some aggressive, others peaceful, greedy or generous. Perception and misperception can sequel as bad decisions are made, especially in times of stress, which continually exemplifies the limits of human understanding of more than scantily human nature. Now, the question is, why does this series of considerations explain how war can manage coming about accord to the text written by Wade L. Huntley, Ph.D. ... Wars or conflicts that would figure into this particular style of analysis would include, the Kurds, Bosnia, and Afghanistan in the grand scheme of war analysis because it would be individual conflicts of interest and security involved. The state level of war analysis includes a basic idea that the key factor is not necessarily found on human factors, but governmental ones in organization and such. The constraints that are created as a result of the basic infrastructure of the country can become a root cause of war. There are two variations to this idea. One is the states nature because each state wants certain things just because they would happen to be sta tes and things analogous security and unity or nationalism would be inclusive within that. Also, included within this attitude is, like individuals, every state would be different. There would be differences that include purposeful, ideological and structural differences to consider. much like the man vs. man consideration, this would be, in order revolutionary vs. status quo, capitalism vs. communism and democracy vs. totalitarianism. So, how can we understand such things, well we examine one of the wars on a state level. This would be, in essence, the Vietnam Conflict in which half(a) the country believed strongly in democratic process and the other half would believe strongly in the communist construct. The same could be said for the Korean War. Understanding the cardinal reasons would hardly gain knowledge as to how the individual level of war interpretations would inevitably cause war. Nor, would this rattling explain the impetus of war in the fact that uncertainty of th e human condition exists. In the State level of war, you have states that control the military, so